The Corporate Climate Commitment Tracker reviews the climate commitments and progress of the 60 largest companies listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the TSX 60 index). We provide an overview of each company’s emissions reduction plans and targets, underlying scenario analysis information, their reliance on offsets and wild card solutions, their disclosed climate-related risks, and their corporate governance responsibilities. All data collected are sourced from publicly available information accessible through company websites.
Company | Net Zero Commitment | Net Zero Target | Reference Year | Interim Target | 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data | 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data | 1st Interim Target Goal | 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data | 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data | 2nd Interim Target Goal | Does the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? | Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? | Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? | Acute risks | Chronic risks | Policy & legal risks | Technology risks | Market risks | Reputation risks | Has the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? | Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? | Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 | 2018 | First Interim: 70% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3; category 6 by 2025 | 157,298.00 | 92,944.00 | 47,189.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) scenarios; net zero scenario (1.5C); divergent net zero (1.5C); below 2C (1.8C); delayed transition (1.7C); nationally determined contributions (2.5C); IPCC RCP8.5 (4.3C) | Yes | Hydrogen | Extreme weather; increased coastal and inland flooding; disruptions to critical infrastructure; mass migration | Longer-term shifts in climate patterns; water stress and prolonged droughts; larger and more intense wildfires; heat waves; mass migration; pests; infectious disease | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Technological or behavioural changes resulting from the transition to a lower-carbon economy that may disrupt current business practices | Shifts in supply and demand for certain commodities, products, and services | Increased climate-related expectations from stakeholders and community | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | PWC LLP | |
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 181.37 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 70% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3; category 6 by 2025 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 157,298.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 92,944.00 1st Interim Target Goal 47,189.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) scenarios; net zero scenario (1.5C); divergent net zero (1.5C); below 2C (1.8C); delayed transition (1.7C); nationally determined contributions (2.5C); IPCC RCP8.5 (4.3C) Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Hydrogen Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather; increased coastal and inland flooding; disruptions to critical infrastructure; mass migration Chronic risks Longer-term shifts in climate patterns; water stress and prolonged droughts; larger and more intense wildfires; heat waves; mass migration; pests; infectious disease
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Technological or behavioural changes resulting from the transition to a lower-carbon economy that may disrupt current business practices Market risks Shifts in supply and demand for certain commodities, products, and services Reputation risks Increased climate-related expectations from stakeholders and community GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? PWC LLP |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 25% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2025; Second Interim: Reduction of 29% for financed energy and 58% for financed power generation Scope 3 category 15 emissions intensity by 2030 | 137,932.00 | 103,827.00 | 103,449.00 | Multiple portfolio sector targets | N/A | N/A | Baseline; below 2C; immediate 2C; net zero 1.5C | Yes | Hydrogen | Changes in frequency or severity of extreme weather events | Increased severe weather event frequency and severity; sea level rise; increased mean average temperature | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Technological or behavioural changes resulting from the transition to a lower-carbon economy that may disrupt current business practices | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | Social risk, reputational damage resulting from social issues such as financing relationships with socially sensitive sectors, human rights issues | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Ernst & Young LLP | |
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 157.234 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 25% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2025; Second Interim: Reduction of 29% for financed energy and 58% for financed power generation Scope 3 category 15 emissions intensity by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 137,932.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 103,827.00 1st Interim Target Goal 103,449.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data Multiple portfolio sector targets 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Baseline; below 2C; immediate 2C; net zero 1.5C Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Hydrogen Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Changes in frequency or severity of extreme weather events Chronic risks Increased severe weather event frequency and severity; sea level rise; increased mean average temperature
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Technological or behavioural changes resulting from the transition to a lower-carbon economy that may disrupt current business practices Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks Social risk, reputational damage resulting from social issues such as financing relationships with socially sensitive sectors, human rights issues GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Ernst & Young LLP |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 43% Reduction of Emissions intensity (tCO2e/mllion GTM) by 2030; Second Interim: 40% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 3 category 3 by 2030 | 11.61 | 10.87 | 6.62 | 3.61 | 3.15 | 2.17 | IPCC RCP 2.6; IPCC 4.5; IEA SDS; NDCs | No | Hydrogen | Extreme weather | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | None found | ||||
Industry Transportation and warehousing Market cap 113.17 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 43% Reduction of Emissions intensity (tCO2e/mllion GTM) by 2030; Second Interim: 40% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 3 category 3 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 11.61 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 10.87 1st Interim Target Goal 6.62 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 3.61 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 3.15 2nd Interim Target Goal 2.17 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IPCC RCP 2.6; IPCC 4.5; IEA SDS; NDCs Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Hydrogen Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2018 | First Interim: 35% Reduction of Scope 1 + 2 emissions intensity (tCO2e/PJ) by 2030 | 770.00 | 564.00 | 500.50 | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA APS—2.1C rise; IEA NZE2050 | Yes | RNG, hydrogen, CCUS | Floods and extreme precipitation; hurricanes and tornados; extreme temperature | Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Technological or behavioural changes resulting from the transition to a lower-carbon economy that may disrupt current business practices | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | Ability to achieve our greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and meet regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Yes (unknown) | |
Industry Utilities Market cap 112.566 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 35% Reduction of Scope 1 + 2 emissions intensity (tCO2e/PJ) by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 770.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 564.00 1st Interim Target Goal 500.50 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA APS—2.1C rise; IEA NZE2050 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? RNG, hydrogen, CCUS Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Floods and extreme precipitation; hurricanes and tornados; extreme temperature Chronic risks Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Technological or behavioural changes resulting from the transition to a lower-carbon economy that may disrupt current business practices Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks Ability to achieve our greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and meet regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Yes (unknown) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2020 | First Interim: 66% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 2,155.00 | 2,468.00 | 732.70 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Changes in weather patterns or extreme weather | Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance | Price stability of renewable power market | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | None found | |||
Industry Real estate, and rental and leasing Market cap 112.523 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 66% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 2,155.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2,468.00 1st Interim Target Goal 732.70 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Changes in weather patterns or extreme weather Chronic risks Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Market risks Price stability of renewable power market Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 100% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories excluding 15 by 2025; Second Interim: Reduction of 30% Scope 1 & 2 oil and gas portfolio, 15% Scope 3 oil and gas portfolio, and 55-60% Scope 1 and 2 power and utilities portfolio Scope 3 category 15 emissions intensity by 2030 | 134,782.00 | 103,937.00 | 0.00 | Multiple portfolio sector targets | N/A | IEA NZE2050; IEA beyond 2C; IEA SDS; Canada's reference pathways = ECCC projects; electricity generation projection | Yes | CCUS, hydrogen, 2nd generation biofuels | Severe weather (e.g., floods, hurricanes, extreme cold, or heat) | Subsidies, taxes, or increased fuel costs | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Morrison Hershfield Limited | |||||
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 96.821 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 100% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories excluding 15 by 2025; Second Interim: Reduction of 30% Scope 1 & 2 oil and gas portfolio, 15% Scope 3 oil and gas portfolio, and 55-60% Scope 1 and 2 power and utilities portfolio Scope 3 category 15 emissions intensity by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 134,782.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 103,937.00 1st Interim Target Goal 0.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data Multiple portfolio sector targets 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA NZE2050; IEA beyond 2C; IEA SDS; Canada's reference pathways = ECCC projects; electricity generation projection Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? CCUS, hydrogen, 2nd generation biofuels Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Severe weather (e.g., floods, hurricanes, extreme cold, or heat) Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Subsidies, taxes, or increased fuel costs Technology risks Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Morrison Hershfield Limited |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 27.5% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 non-locomotive operations by 2030; Second Interim: 38.3% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 3 category 15 by 2030 | 866,000.00 | 884,000.00 | 627,850.00 | 24.55 | 25.17 | 15.15 | IEA SDS; IEA STEPS; BAU scenario (5-6C) | No | Hydrogen fuel cells | Intense weather may increase (or decrease in some cases) costs for CP due to delays, disruptions, derailments, and other events. | Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure. | Carbon pricing: new or additional carbon pricing could lead to increased costs, which may impact the company’s advantage over competitors. Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Decrease in demand for fossil fuels | Ability to achieve our greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and meet regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations, risks associated with inability to meet these targets. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Yes (unknown) | ||
Industry Transportation and warehousing Market cap 96.456 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 27.5% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 non-locomotive operations by 2030; Second Interim: 38.3% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 3 category 15 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 866,000.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 884,000.00 1st Interim Target Goal 627,850.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 24.55 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 25.17 2nd Interim Target Goal 15.15 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA SDS; IEA STEPS; BAU scenario (5-6C) Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Hydrogen fuel cells Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Intense weather may increase (or decrease in some cases) costs for CP due to delays, disruptions, derailments, and other events. Chronic risks Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure.
Policy & legal risks
Carbon pricing: new or additional carbon pricing could lead to increased costs, which may impact the company’s advantage over competitors. Technology risks Market risks Decrease in demand for fossil fuels Reputation risks Ability to achieve our greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and meet regulatory requirements and stakeholder expectations, risks associated with inability to meet these targets. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Yes (unknown) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories 5, 6 by 2030; Second Interim: Reduction of 33% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity of the oil and gas portfolio; 24% reduction in absolute Scope 3 emissions in the oil and gas portfolio; 45% reduction in carbon intensity in power generation portfolio Scope 3 category 15 by 2030 | 161,766.00 | 113,236.20 | 113,236.20 | Multiple portfolio sector targets | N/A | Oil and gas: Disorderly transition, integrated REMIND + 2C scenario; orderly transition (2C); disorderly transition (2C); net zero carbon emissions by 2070 + hothouse world (3C+); IEA's 2021 NZE 2050; GCAM's Net Zero 2050; IPCC net zero aligned scenarios AIM/CGE SSP1-19 & SSP2-19; IPCC net zero aligned scenario MESSAGE-GLOBIOM 1.0 SSP2-19 | Yes | DAC | Physical risks from environmental events, such as droughts, floods, wildfires, earthquakes, and hurricanes and other storms could also potentially disrupt our operations | Legal and regulatory risks could arise from our actual or perceived actions, or inaction, and those of clients in relation to climate change and other environmental and social risk issues, or disclosures related to environmental issues | Stakeholders look to hold banks responsible for financing clients who are viewed as responsible for negative impacts of climate change. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Morrison Hershfield | |||||
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 89.105 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories 5, 6 by 2030; Second Interim: Reduction of 33% reduction in Scope 1 and 2 emissions intensity of the oil and gas portfolio; 24% reduction in absolute Scope 3 emissions in the oil and gas portfolio; 45% reduction in carbon intensity in power generation portfolio Scope 3 category 15 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 161,766.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 113,236.20 1st Interim Target Goal 113,236.20 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data Multiple portfolio sector targets 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Oil and gas: Disorderly transition, integrated REMIND + 2C scenario; orderly transition (2C); disorderly transition (2C); net zero carbon emissions by 2070 + hothouse world (3C+); IEA's 2021 NZE 2050; GCAM's Net Zero 2050; IPCC net zero aligned scenarios AIM/CGE SSP1-19 & SSP2-19; IPCC net zero aligned scenario MESSAGE-GLOBIOM 1.0 SSP2-19 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? DAC Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Physical risks from environmental events, such as droughts, floods, wildfires, earthquakes, and hurricanes and other storms could also potentially disrupt our operations Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Legal and regulatory risks could arise from our actual or perceived actions, or inaction, and those of clients in relation to climate change and other environmental and social risk issues, or disclosures related to environmental issues Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks Stakeholders look to hold banks responsible for financing clients who are viewed as responsible for negative impacts of climate change. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Morrison Hershfield |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Indirectly | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2016 | First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute methane emissions (tCO2e) by 2030 | 4.61 | 2.55 | 2.31 | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA SDS, IEA WEO STEPS; Equinor Energy Perspectives-rivalry; BP Energy Outlook business-as-usual scenario; Equinor Energy Perspectives-reform; Shell Sky scenario; BP Energy Outlook-rapid scenario; Equinor Energy Perspectives-rebalance; BP Energy Outlook-net zero scenario | No | CCUS | Unexpected events such as fires or severe storms and other calamitous acts of nature impact the company and that may or may not be financially recoverable. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance | Volatility in the prevailing prices of crude oil and NGLs, natural gas and refined products | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | Yes | PWC LLP | ||||
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 82.951 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Indirectly Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2016 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute methane emissions (tCO2e) by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 4.61 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2.55 1st Interim Target Goal 2.31 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA SDS, IEA WEO STEPS; Equinor Energy Perspectives-rivalry; BP Energy Outlook business-as-usual scenario; Equinor Energy Perspectives-reform; Shell Sky scenario; BP Energy Outlook-rapid scenario; Equinor Energy Perspectives-rebalance; BP Energy Outlook-net zero scenario Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? CCUS Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Unexpected events such as fires or severe storms and other calamitous acts of nature impact the company and that may or may not be financially recoverable. Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Market risks Volatility in the prevailing prices of crude oil and NGLs, natural gas and refined products Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? PWC LLP |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 | 2018 | First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030; Second Interim: 25% Reduction of Absolute Scope 3 category 3, 6, 7 by 2025 | 97,600.00 | 70,800.00 | 48,800.00 | 23,000.00 | 2,100.00 | 17,250.00 | N/A | Yes | Not disclosed | Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met. | Yes board oversight Yes Management Responsibilities | No | None found | ||||||
Industry Information and cultural industries Market cap 72.47 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030; Second Interim: 25% Reduction of Absolute Scope 3 category 3, 6, 7 by 2025 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 97,600.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 70,800.00 1st Interim Target Goal 48,800.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 23,000.00 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2,100.00 2nd Interim Target Goal 17,250.00 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes Management Responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2 (CO₂ equivalent emissions per unit of energy transported or produced for customers annually) by 2030 | Not disclosed | Not disclosed | Not disclosed | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA STEPS; IEA SDS; accelerated energy transition scenario (unknown third party) | Yes | Hydrogen, CCUS | Significant changes in temperature and weather, including the potential impacts of climate change, have effects ranging from the impact on demand, availability and commodity prices, to efficiency and output capability. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Uncertainty around traditional and energy transition technology development and deployment | Decrease in demand for fossil fuels | Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | None found | ||
Industry Transportation and warehousing Market cap 66.13 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2 (CO₂ equivalent emissions per unit of energy transported or produced for customers annually) by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data Not disclosed 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data Not disclosed 1st Interim Target Goal Not disclosed 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA STEPS; IEA SDS; accelerated energy transition scenario (unknown third party) Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Hydrogen, CCUS Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Significant changes in temperature and weather, including the potential impacts of climate change, have effects ranging from the impact on demand, availability and commodity prices, to efficiency and output capability. Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Uncertainty around traditional and energy transition technology development and deployment Market risks Decrease in demand for fossil fuels Reputation risks Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2018 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity tCO2e per tonne of product produced Scope 1 by 2030; Second Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity tCO2e per tonne of product produced Scope 2 by 2030 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.10 | IEA SDS; IEA STEPS; IPCC AR5 RCP 2.6, 4.5, 8.5 | Yes | Not disclosed | Extreme weather events can strain upstream or downstream supply chains | Weather can also have an adverse effect on crop yields, which could lower the income of growers and impair their ability to purchase crop nutrients, crop protection, and seed products and services. | Current and increasing regulation of greenhouse gases may impact operations by: requiring changes to production processes, increasing raw material, energy, production or transportation costs in order to ensure compliance, additional costs in the form of taxes, emission allowances or other carbon pricing mechanisms, increased input costs and compliance-related costs for agricultural customers, which could result in lower demand for our products and reduced revenues. | Demand for new types of seeds or services | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Yes (KPMG) | |||
Industry Wholesale trade Market cap 65.003 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity tCO2e per tonne of product produced Scope 1 by 2030; Second Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity tCO2e per tonne of product produced Scope 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 0.53 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 0.52 1st Interim Target Goal 0.37 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 0.14 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 0.13 2nd Interim Target Goal 0.10 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA SDS; IEA STEPS; IPCC AR5 RCP 2.6, 4.5, 8.5 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather events can strain upstream or downstream supply chains Chronic risks Weather can also have an adverse effect on crop yields, which could lower the income of growers and impair their ability to purchase crop nutrients, crop protection, and seed products and services.
Policy & legal risks
Current and increasing regulation of greenhouse gases may impact operations by: requiring changes to production processes, increasing raw material, energy, production or transportation costs in order to ensure compliance, additional costs in the form of taxes, emission allowances or other carbon pricing mechanisms, increased input costs and compliance-related costs for agricultural customers, which could result in lower demand for our products and reduced revenues. Technology risks Demand for new types of seeds or services Market risks Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Yes (KPMG) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes | N/A | Weather conditions can have an impact on our revenues as historical purchase patterns. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance | New technologies may result in decreased demand for petroleum-based fuel. | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, changes in subsidies available | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | None found | |||
Industry Retail trade Market cap 61.4 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? N/A Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Weather conditions can have an impact on our revenues as historical purchase patterns. Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks New technologies may result in decreased demand for petroleum-based fuel. Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, changes in subsidies available Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 | 2020 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2028; Second Interim: Reduction of 35% Scope 1 & 2 and 27% Scope 3 emissions intensity of the oil & gas sector portfolio Scope 3 category 15 by 2028 | 57,100.00 | 51,271.00 | 39,970.00 | Multiple portfolio sector targets | N/A | Below 2C immediate; below 2C delayed; net zero 2050 | Yes | Not disclosed | Severe weather events, forest fires, floods | Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure. | Volatility in the prevailing prices of crude oil and NGLs, natural gas and refined products | Changing stakeholder expectations and perceptions related to CIBC’s climate-related actions; failure to meet stakeholder demand of climate-related products and services | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | None found | ||||
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 60.509 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2028; Second Interim: Reduction of 35% Scope 1 & 2 and 27% Scope 3 emissions intensity of the oil & gas sector portfolio Scope 3 category 15 by 2028 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 57,100.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 51,271.00 1st Interim Target Goal 39,970.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data Multiple portfolio sector targets 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Below 2C immediate; below 2C delayed; net zero 2050 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Severe weather events, forest fires, floods Chronic risks Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure.
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Market risks Volatility in the prevailing prices of crude oil and NGLs, natural gas and refined products Reputation risks Changing stakeholder expectations and perceptions related to CIBC’s climate-related actions; failure to meet stakeholder demand of climate-related products and services GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | None found | |
Industry Retail trade Market cap 59.381 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? N/A Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? N/A Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks N/A Chronic risks N/A
Policy & legal risks
N/A Technology risks N/A Market risks N/A Reputation risks N/A GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 | 2014 | First Interim: 10Mt Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 20,857,000.00 | 21,557,000.00 | 10,857,000.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Autonomy: technology and policy context closest to limiting global warming to 2C or less vs. pre-industrial levels; rivalry: population growth, urbanization, and growing middle class drive energy demand—diverse supply is required to satisfy demand, with intense competition for market share between energy sources; discord: less on extreme volatility and more on enduring disunity, uncertainty, long-term market weakness, and nationalism. | No | CCUS, hydrogen | Seasonal flooding | Prolonged periods of extreme cold could force facilities into extended shutdowns to ensure worker safety and prevent undue stress on equipment. Prolonged periods of extreme heat may lead to production cuts if an adequate supply of cooling water is not available. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Limitations related to the development, adoption and success of these technologies or the development of disruptive technologies | Volatility in the prevailing prices of crude oil and NGLs, natural gas and refined products | Failure to meet requirement to consult with Indigenous peoples in respect of oil and gas projects and related infrastructure | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | EY LLP | |
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 59.08 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 Reference Year 2014 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 10Mt Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 20,857,000.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 21,557,000.00 1st Interim Target Goal 10,857,000.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Autonomy: technology and policy context closest to limiting global warming to 2C or less vs. pre-industrial levels; rivalry: population growth, urbanization, and growing middle class drive energy demand—diverse supply is required to satisfy demand, with intense competition for market share between energy sources; discord: less on extreme volatility and more on enduring disunity, uncertainty, long-term market weakness, and nationalism. Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? CCUS, hydrogen Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Seasonal flooding Chronic risks Prolonged periods of extreme cold could force facilities into extended shutdowns to ensure worker safety and prevent undue stress on equipment. Prolonged periods of extreme heat may lead to production cuts if an adequate supply of cooling water is not available.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Limitations related to the development, adoption and success of these technologies or the development of disruptive technologies Market risks Volatility in the prevailing prices of crude oil and NGLs, natural gas and refined products Reputation risks Failure to meet requirement to consult with Indigenous peoples in respect of oil and gas projects and related infrastructure GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? EY LLP |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (excluding category 1) by 2050 | 2020 | First Interim: 57.% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030; Second Interim: 42% Reduction of Absolute Scope 3 excluding category 1 by 2030 | 303,544.00 | 275,722.00 | 130,523.92 | 1,947,578.00 | 1,861,651.00 | 1,129,595.24 | IPCC RCP 4.5; IPCC RCP 8.5; IEA SDS; Bank of Canada NDC; IEA STEPS | Yes | Not disclosed | Increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events, increased operating costs, asset impairment, increased insurance premiums | Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure. | Carbon pricing regulations; increased operational costs due to rising price of energy | Increased operational costs due to rising price of energy | Decreased demand for our products and services due to not effectively managing or reducing climate-related impacts; increased cost of capital due to degrading climate-related rankings. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | PWC LLP | ||
Industry Information and cultural industries Market cap 58.674 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (excluding category 1) by 2050 Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 57.% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030; Second Interim: 42% Reduction of Absolute Scope 3 excluding category 1 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 303,544.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 275,722.00 1st Interim Target Goal 130,523.92 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 1,947,578.00 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 1,861,651.00 2nd Interim Target Goal 1,129,595.24 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IPCC RCP 4.5; IPCC RCP 8.5; IEA SDS; Bank of Canada NDC; IEA STEPS Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Increased severity and frequency of extreme weather events, increased operating costs, asset impairment, increased insurance premiums Chronic risks Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure.
Policy & legal risks
Carbon pricing regulations; increased operational costs due to rising price of energy Technology risks Market risks Increased operational costs due to rising price of energy Reputation risks Decreased demand for our products and services due to not effectively managing or reducing climate-related impacts; increased cost of capital due to degrading climate-related rankings. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? PWC LLP |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 35% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2035 | 10,700,000.00 | 19,400,000.00 | 6,955,000.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Reference case; accelerated diversification; aggresive diversification (IEA SDS) | Yes | CCS | Floods, forest fires, earthquakes, hurricanes, typhoons, and other extreme weather or geologic events. Climate change may increase the frequency of severe weather conditions, which may impact our business and financial results. | Our exploration and production activities are subject to chronic physical risks such as a shorter timeframe for our winter drilling program, changes in water tables and reduced access to water due to drought conditions. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance | Limitations related to the development, adoption and success of these technologies or the development of disruptive technologies | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | Negative reputation of fossil fuel development, risk of failure to meet climate-related targets | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | EY LLP | |
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 47.012 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 35% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2035 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 10,700,000.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 19,400,000.00 1st Interim Target Goal 6,955,000.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Reference case; accelerated diversification; aggresive diversification (IEA SDS) Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? CCS Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Floods, forest fires, earthquakes, hurricanes, typhoons, and other extreme weather or geologic events. Climate change may increase the frequency of severe weather conditions, which may impact our business and financial results. Chronic risks Our exploration and production activities are subject to chronic physical risks such as a shorter timeframe for our winter drilling program, changes in water tables and reduced access to water due to drought conditions.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Limitations related to the development, adoption and success of these technologies or the development of disruptive technologies Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks Negative reputation of fossil fuel development, risk of failure to meet climate-related targets GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? EY LLP |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 35% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories 1, 3, 5, 6, 9 by 2035 | 760,616.00 | 688,010.00 | 494,400.40 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1.5C, 2C, 3C, and 4C scenarios | Yes | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure and assets becoming stranded. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance | Increased costs to deployment of advanced technologies for buildings, demand for high-quality transactable ESG data, real-time metering, and shifting to renewable energy sources | Level of competition, shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | Risk of reputation as laggard in climate action | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | LRQA Independent Assurance Statement | |
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 46.976 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 35% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories 1, 3, 5, 6, 9 by 2035 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 760,616.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 688,010.00 1st Interim Target Goal 494,400.40 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? 1.5C, 2C, 3C, and 4C scenarios Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure and assets becoming stranded.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Increased costs to deployment of advanced technologies for buildings, demand for high-quality transactable ESG data, real-time metering, and shifting to renewable energy sources Market risks Level of competition, shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks Risk of reputation as laggard in climate action GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? LRQA Independent Assurance Statement |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | 2018 | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes | N/A | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Volatility to the price of renewable natural gas | Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Yes (unknown) | |||
Industry Administrative and support, waste management, and remediation services Market cap 46.485 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? N/A Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Market risks Volatility to the price of renewable natural gas Reputation risks Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Yes (unknown) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | N/A | N/A | None found | ||||||
Industry Information and cultural industries Market cap 45.563 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? N/A Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? N/A Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? N/A Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? N/A Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2019 | First Interim: 46% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 category 6 by 2030; Second Interim: 55.% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 3 categories 1, 2, 11 by 2030 | 311,344.00 | 256,883.00 | 168,125.76 | 292.00 | 275.00 | 131.40 | Low-carbon adaptation (global temperature rises approximately 1.5C); extreme global warming (global temperature rises approximately 4C) | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Effectiveness of network design, maintenance, change management processes, event monitoring, and incident response management and investigation may impact network reliability and the frequency and duration of outages. | Rapid changes to limit carbon emissions may create significant changes to our suppliers’ practices. Suppliers who fail to transition to low-carbon strategies for product development, component manufacturing, or service delivery and support, may impact the ability to meet constantly changing and increasing customer expectations while maintaining quality of service. | Risks associated with insufficient transparency on climate-related goals and targets | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Deloitte LLP | |||
Industry Information and cultural industries Market cap 41.425 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 46% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 category 6 by 2030; Second Interim: 55.% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 3 categories 1, 2, 11 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 311,344.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 256,883.00 1st Interim Target Goal 168,125.76 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 292.00 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 275.00 2nd Interim Target Goal 131.40 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Low-carbon adaptation (global temperature rises approximately 1.5C); extreme global warming (global temperature rises approximately 4C) Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Effectiveness of network design, maintenance, change management processes, event monitoring, and incident response management and investigation may impact network reliability and the frequency and duration of outages.
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Rapid changes to limit carbon emissions may create significant changes to our suppliers’ practices. Suppliers who fail to transition to low-carbon strategies for product development, component manufacturing, or service delivery and support, may impact the ability to meet constantly changing and increasing customer expectations while maintaining quality of service. Market risks Reputation risks Risks associated with insufficient transparency on climate-related goals and targets GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Deloitte LLP |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2040, Scope 3 by 2050 by 2050 | 2020 | First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 796,615.00 | 763,659.00 | 398,307.50 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | N/A | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Certain global climate change patterns (e.g., rising sea levels, changing rain fall) may impact sourcing of food and food ingredients. | Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | None found | ||||
Industry Retail trade Market cap 39.287 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2040, Scope 3 by 2050 by 2050 Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 796,615.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 763,659.00 1st Interim Target Goal 398,307.50 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? N/A Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Certain global climate change patterns (e.g., rising sea levels, changing rain fall) may impact sourcing of food and food ingredients.
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2018 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 7,541,000.00 | 7,400,000.00 | 5,278,700.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA STEPS; IEA SDS; IEA NZE2050 | Yes | Not disclosed | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met, negative publicity associated with climate litigation | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) independent verification | |||||
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 38.024 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 7,541,000.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 7,400,000.00 1st Interim Target Goal 5,278,700.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA STEPS; IEA SDS; IEA NZE2050 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met, negative publicity associated with climate litigation GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) independent verification |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2016 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.27 | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA STEPS; IEA SDS | Yes | CCS, hydrogen, nuclear SMRs, DAC | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Seasonal weather patterns, which affect the demand for our products, including lower demand for gasoline. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Uncertainty around traditional and energy transition technology development and deployment, increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources, technological changes or consumer preferences that alter fuel choices, such as technological advances in energy storage that make wind and solar more competitive for power generation. | Level of competition, shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, volatility of fossil fuel prices | Negative perception by investors or others of insufficient progress being made with respect to the company’s ambition in the energy transition. Imperial’s reputation may also be harmed by events which negatively affect the image of the industry as a whole, including public and investor perception of Alberta oil sands in relation to greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impact. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | Greenhouse gas emissions are third-party verified | |
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 37.481 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2016 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 0.39 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 0.38 1st Interim Target Goal 0.27 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA STEPS; IEA SDS Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? CCS, hydrogen, nuclear SMRs, DAC Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Seasonal weather patterns, which affect the demand for our products, including lower demand for gasoline.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Uncertainty around traditional and energy transition technology development and deployment, increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources, technological changes or consumer preferences that alter fuel choices, such as technological advances in energy storage that make wind and solar more competitive for power generation. Market risks Level of competition, shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, volatility of fossil fuel prices Reputation risks Negative perception by investors or others of insufficient progress being made with respect to the company’s ambition in the energy transition. Imperial’s reputation may also be harmed by events which negatively affect the image of the industry as a whole, including public and investor perception of Alberta oil sands in relation to greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impact. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Greenhouse gas emissions are third-party verified |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 3 categories 6, 9 by 2030 | 72,506.00 | 60,748.00 | 36,253.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bank of Canada and OSFI pilot project | Yes | N/A | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Impacts on the availability of food and water | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Level of competition, shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, risk of stranded assets | Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met, or climate objectives are not sufficiently ambitious | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | KPMG LLP Limited Assurance | ||
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 36.419 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 3 categories 6, 9 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 72,506.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 60,748.00 1st Interim Target Goal 36,253.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Bank of Canada and OSFI pilot project Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? N/A Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Impacts on the availability of food and water
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market risks Level of competition, shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, risk of stranded assets Reputation risks Failure to satisfy stakeholders if climate objectives are not met, or climate objectives are not sufficiently ambitious GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? KPMG LLP Limited Assurance |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations only) by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 category 6 by 2030 | 43,603.00 | 30,921.00 | 21,801.50 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Bank of Canada and OSFI pilot project | Yes | N/A | Extreme weather can negatively impact revenues from insurance premiums | Changing weather patterns have resulted in hotter, drier weather in some areas and more humid, wetter weather in other areas. The result has been more unpredictability in weather and increasingly severe storms. | Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Climate change inaction | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | None found | |||
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 33.798 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations only) by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 category 6 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 43,603.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 30,921.00 1st Interim Target Goal 21,801.50 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Bank of Canada and OSFI pilot project Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? N/A Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact revenues from insurance premiums Chronic risks Changing weather patterns have resulted in hotter, drier weather in some areas and more humid, wetter weather in other areas. The result has been more unpredictability in weather and increasingly severe storms.
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks Climate change inaction GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? None found |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA SDS | Yes | CCUS, hydrogen | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Certain events and weather patterns cause production delays and cessations for certain operations. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | Failure to meet net zero industry targets | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | KPMG LLP Limited Assurance | ||
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 32.58 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA SDS Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? CCUS, hydrogen Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Certain events and weather patterns cause production delays and cessations for certain operations.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks Failure to meet net zero industry targets GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? KPMG LLP Limited Assurance |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 25% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories 1, 6 by 2025; Second Interim: 31% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2, 3 financed emissions (tCO2e/TJ) by 2025 | 19,971.00 | 13,951.00 | 14,978.25 | 5.72 | 5.72 | 3.94 | Orderly transition (1.5C); disorderly transition (1.5C); hot house world (3C) | Yes | CO2 removal | Failure to adequately assess future policies and misalign portfolio to climate-related policies | Risks associated with inadequate or non-compliant with climate commitments. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Groupe AGÉCO, an independent third party, calculated our greenhouse gas emissions | |||||
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 31.39 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 (operations and financed) by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 25% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories 1, 6 by 2025; Second Interim: 31% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2, 3 financed emissions (tCO2e/TJ) by 2025 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 19,971.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 13,951.00 1st Interim Target Goal 14,978.25 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 5.72 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 5.72 2nd Interim Target Goal 3.94 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Orderly transition (1.5C); disorderly transition (1.5C); hot house world (3C) Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? CO2 removal Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Failure to adequately assess future policies and misalign portfolio to climate-related policies Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks Risks associated with inadequate or non-compliant with climate commitments. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Groupe AGÉCO, an independent third party, calculated our greenhouse gas emissions |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1 by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1 by 2030 | 11,925,000.00 | 9,742,000.00 | 5,962,500.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | Global net zero scenario (1.5C); low-carbon scenario (1.65C); 2C scenario (2C); high-carbon scenario (2.7-3.7C) | No | Hydrogen, CCUS, nuclear | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Changes in precipitation that result in droughts could increase the risk of wildfire caused by the corporation's electricity assets or may cause water shortages that could adversely affect operations. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Improvements in renewable energy technologies impact the current demand of existing products | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Yes (unknown) | ||
Industry Utilities Market cap 28.74 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1 by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 11,925,000.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 9,742,000.00 1st Interim Target Goal 5,962,500.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Global net zero scenario (1.5C); low-carbon scenario (1.65C); 2C scenario (2C); high-carbon scenario (2.7-3.7C) Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Hydrogen, CCUS, nuclear Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Changes in precipitation that result in droughts could increase the risk of wildfire caused by the corporation's electricity assets or may cause water shortages that could adversely affect operations.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Improvements in renewable energy technologies impact the current demand of existing products Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Yes (unknown) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | No Scope emissions mentionned, Net Zero by 2050 | Not found | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | Yes (unknown) | |||||
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 26.909 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target No Scope emissions mentionned, Net Zero by 2050 Reference Year Not found Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Yes (unknown) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2019 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, volatility of commodity prices | Negative publicity related to pipeline accidents, opposition of new projectsr elated to energy, oil sands, and pipeline development and, particularly, with shipment of production from oil sands regions. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | No | |||
Industry Transportation and warehousing Market cap 26.396 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 0.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 0.00 1st Interim Target Goal 0.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, volatility of commodity prices Reputation risks Negative publicity related to pipeline accidents, opposition of new projectsr elated to energy, oil sands, and pipeline development and, particularly, with shipment of production from oil sands regions. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2018 | First Interim: 25% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1 (1000 tonnes CO2e/boe) by 2027; Second Interim: 25% Reduction of Total methane emissions by 2023 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 547,396.00 | 585,069.00 | 410,547.00 | IEA STEPS; IEA SDS; IEA current policies | Yes | Hydrogen, CCUS | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Long-term changes in weather impacting operations (e.g., long-term weather patterns increasing road bans or other operational issues). | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Lack of technological advancement, scalability, and cost effectiveness to assist in the reductions of emissions. | Decreased market demand due to political factors, lack of pipeline access, discrepancies in carbon policies in pricing in different jurisdictions and substitution from natural gas to alternatives. | Potential for political and regulatory rhetoric to negatively impact the reputation of Canada’s energy sector making it difficult to operate and access capital. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | No | |
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 24.686 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 25% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1 (1000 tonnes CO2e/boe) by 2027; Second Interim: 25% Reduction of Total methane emissions by 2023 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 0.02 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 0.02 1st Interim Target Goal 0.01 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 547,396.00 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 585,069.00 2nd Interim Target Goal 410,547.00 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA STEPS; IEA SDS; IEA current policies Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Hydrogen, CCUS Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Long-term changes in weather impacting operations (e.g., long-term weather patterns increasing road bans or other operational issues).
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Lack of technological advancement, scalability, and cost effectiveness to assist in the reductions of emissions. Market risks Decreased market demand due to political factors, lack of pipeline access, discrepancies in carbon policies in pricing in different jurisdictions and substitution from natural gas to alternatives. Reputation risks Potential for political and regulatory rhetoric to negatively impact the reputation of Canada’s energy sector making it difficult to operate and access capital. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Property risk concentrations, seismic zones, tropical cyclone zones, flood zones, water security | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing, phase-out of ICE-vehicle related components | Investments in automotive technologies that support the transition to ZLEVs can be significant, particularly in product areas such as battery systems for hybrid and EVs. | Volatility of carbon prices for the production of steel | Risk of failure to keep up with climate-related targets within the industry. Although we expect to meet or exceed our customers’ expectations, the inability to do so within the timeframes expected could result in the loss of some future business. Reputational risks from participation in the automotive industry. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | No | |
Industry Manufacturing Market cap 24.371 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Property risk concentrations, seismic zones, tropical cyclone zones, flood zones, water security
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing, phase-out of ICE-vehicle related components Technology risks Investments in automotive technologies that support the transition to ZLEVs can be significant, particularly in product areas such as battery systems for hybrid and EVs. Market risks Volatility of carbon prices for the production of steel Reputation risks Risk of failure to keep up with climate-related targets within the industry. Although we expect to meet or exceed our customers’ expectations, the inability to do so within the timeframes expected could result in the loss of some future business. Reputational risks from participation in the automotive industry. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2020 | First Interim: 66% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 2,800,000.00 | 2,900,000.00 | 952,000.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Climate change may increase the frequency and severity of severe weather conditions.Customers’ requirements for our services may vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity, customers’ demand for our services could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of changing weather conditions. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing, risks concerning potentially more stringent future reporting requirements | Alternative technologies could impact the demand for, or use of, the business and assets that we own and operate and could impair or eliminate our competitive advantage of our businesses and assets. | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, risk of stranded assets related to oil and gas | Actors disagree with the ESG disclosures , regulatory enforcement action | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | Yes (unknown) | |
Industry Utilities Market cap 24.278 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 66% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 2,800,000.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2,900,000.00 1st Interim Target Goal 952,000.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Climate change may increase the frequency and severity of severe weather conditions.Customers’ requirements for our services may vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity, customers’ demand for our services could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of changing weather conditions.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing, risks concerning potentially more stringent future reporting requirements Technology risks Alternative technologies could impact the demand for, or use of, the business and assets that we own and operate and could impair or eliminate our competitive advantage of our businesses and assets. Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, risk of stranded assets related to oil and gas Reputation risks Actors disagree with the ESG disclosures , regulatory enforcement action GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Yes (unknown) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2019 | First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030; Second Interim: 50% Reduction of Emissions intensity tCO2e per metric tonne of food and per franchise restaurant by 2030 | 60,804.00 | 63,104.00 | 30,402.00 | Not disclosed | Not disclosed | Not disclosed | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Profitability will depend on ability to anticipate and react to changes in food and commodity and supply costs. Markets for beef and chicken are subject to significant price fluctuations due to seasonal shifts. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increasing pressure to deepen climate commitments | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | No | ||||
Industry Accommodation and food services Market cap 23.844 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030; Second Interim: 50% Reduction of Emissions intensity tCO2e per metric tonne of food and per franchise restaurant by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 60,804.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 63,104.00 1st Interim Target Goal 30,402.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data Not disclosed 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data Not disclosed 2nd Interim Target Goal Not disclosed Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Profitability will depend on ability to anticipate and react to changes in food and commodity and supply costs. Markets for beef and chicken are subject to significant price fluctuations due to seasonal shifts.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increasing pressure to deepen climate commitments Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 3 by 2030 | Not found | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration | Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration | Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration | Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration | Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | No | ||
Industry Professional, scientific, and technical services Market cap 23.526 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 3 by 2030 Reference Year Not found Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration Chronic risks Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration
Policy & legal risks
Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration Technology risks Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration Market risks Indicated as a risk, but no elaboration Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 | 2020 | First Interim: 33% Reduction of Carbon intensity Scope 3 category 15 by 2030 | Multiple portfolio sector targets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA STEPS; IEA SDS; IEA NZE2050 | Yes | CCUS | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact transportation. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Technological advances have the ability to impact operational competitiveness as well as product demand | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, decreased demand for insurance of carbon-intensive services | Poor performance with managing the risks and opportunities of climate change could result in reputational impairment. This could lead to public and regulatory opposition to Teck projects or operations, or lead to a potential increase in the cost of capital and perceived risk among the investor community. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | Yes | No | |
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 23.32 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 33% Reduction of Carbon intensity Scope 3 category 15 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data Multiple portfolio sector targets 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA STEPS; IEA SDS; IEA NZE2050 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? CCUS Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact transportation.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Technological advances have the ability to impact operational competitiveness as well as product demand Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, decreased demand for insurance of carbon-intensive services Reputation risks Poor performance with managing the risks and opportunities of climate change could result in reputational impairment. This could lead to public and regulatory opposition to Teck projects or operations, or lead to a potential increase in the cost of capital and perceived risk among the investor community. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2011 | First Interim: 25% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2025 | 197,448.00 | 135,754.00 | 148,086.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | BAU; Grid decarbonization; 1.5C | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Increased precipitation and temperatures could impact our wireless connectivity performance and damage critical infrastructure, resulting in increased expenditure in cooling and protection of our network infrastructure, technology, and buildings. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Market expectations for low-carbon technologies could impact our competitiveness and the demand for our products and services, potentially decreasing operating revenues. | Rising consumer expectations of products that are less environmentally damaging | Increased stakeholder perception for failing to take climate action and offer low-carbon products and services could impact our reputation with all our stakeholders (i.e. employees, customers, general public, and investors) potentially resulting in reduced revenue. | Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities | No | KPMG LLP Limited Assurance | |
Industry Information and cultural industries Market cap 23.24 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2011 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 25% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2025 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 197,448.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 135,754.00 1st Interim Target Goal 148,086.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? BAU; Grid decarbonization; 1.5C Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Increased precipitation and temperatures could impact our wireless connectivity performance and damage critical infrastructure, resulting in increased expenditure in cooling and protection of our network infrastructure, technology, and buildings.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market expectations for low-carbon technologies could impact our competitiveness and the demand for our products and services, potentially decreasing operating revenues. Market risks Rising consumer expectations of products that are less environmentally damaging Reputation risks Increased stakeholder perception for failing to take climate action and offer low-carbon products and services could impact our reputation with all our stakeholders (i.e. employees, customers, general public, and investors) potentially resulting in reduced revenue. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Yes management responsibilities Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? KPMG LLP Limited Assurance |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2019 | First Interim: 25% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 5.70 | 5.30 | 4.28 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | No | |
Industry Retail trade Market cap 23.126 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 25% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 5.70 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 5.30 1st Interim Target Goal 4.28 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? N/A Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? N/A Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks N/A Chronic risks N/A
Policy & legal risks
N/A Technology risks N/A Market risks N/A Reputation risks N/A GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Indirectly | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |
Industry Manufacturing Market cap 22.745 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Indirectly Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? N/A Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? N/A Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks N/A Chronic risks N/A
Policy & legal risks
N/A Technology risks N/A Market risks N/A Reputation risks N/A GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? N/A Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? N/A Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? N/A |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Indirectly | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Green orderly and disorderly (2C); brown scenario 4.5C; IEA 450 scenario; NPS scenario | N/A | Not disclosed | N/A | N/A | N/A N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | N/A | |
Industry Finance and insurance Market cap 21.877 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Indirectly Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? Green orderly and disorderly (2C); brown scenario 4.5C; IEA 450 scenario; NPS scenario Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? N/A Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks N/A Chronic risks N/A
Policy & legal risks
N/A Technology risks N/A Market risks N/A Reputation risks N/A GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? N/A |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2018 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 332,173.00 | 305,129.00 | 232,521.10 | N/A | N/A | N/A | High warming scenario (2.7C-3.7C); low warming scenario (2C); intermediate scenario (Unknown ITR) | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Changes in public opinion, attitudes towards the company’s privatization, failure to deliver on its customer promises, failure to comply with mandatory reliability regulations established by the NERC and NPCC, failure to adequately respond to social issues raised by employees, partners and/stakeholders and other external forces. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | GHD | |||
Industry Utilities Market cap 21.129 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 332,173.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 305,129.00 1st Interim Target Goal 232,521.10 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? High warming scenario (2.7C-3.7C); low warming scenario (2C); intermediate scenario (Unknown ITR) Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Increased operating costs due to extended cooling requirements, increased investment requirements in new resilient technology and construction, rising sea levels may adversely impact infrastructure.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks Changes in public opinion, attitudes towards the company’s privatization, failure to deliver on its customer promises, failure to comply with mandatory reliability regulations established by the NERC and NPCC, failure to adequately respond to social issues raised by employees, partners and/stakeholders and other external forces. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? GHD |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2018 | First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 | 25.93 | 35.10 | 12.97 | N/A | N/A | N/A | BAU scenario/IEA CPS (4.5C); IPCC SSP-8.5; IPCC RCP-8.5; IEA NZE2050 (1.5C); IPCC SSP1-1.9; IPCC RCP1.9 | Yes | Hydrogen | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions | Negatively impact the ability of mining partners to develop or continue to operate the mine, which may impact the delivery of precious metals or cobalt to Wheaton, the costs to develop or operate the mine, the value of a particular precious metals purchase agreement. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing, failure to obtain necessary permits to continue mining operations Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Mining partners are responsible for decision-making and costs related to technology and the deployment of low carbon technologies and mines. Risks of failure by mining partners to implement low carbon technologies. | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, risk of restricted access to capital markets in the event of failure to comply with growing ESG reporting requirements | Stakeholders perceive mining partners as contributing to chronic physical impacts through their use of resources in resource-stressed regions (e.g. water-stressed regions) | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | Yes | No | |
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 19.653 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 25.93 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 35.10 1st Interim Target Goal 12.97 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? BAU scenario/IEA CPS (4.5C); IPCC SSP-8.5; IPCC RCP-8.5; IEA NZE2050 (1.5C); IPCC SSP1-1.9; IPCC RCP1.9 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Hydrogen Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions Chronic risks Negatively impact the ability of mining partners to develop or continue to operate the mine, which may impact the delivery of precious metals or cobalt to Wheaton, the costs to develop or operate the mine, the value of a particular precious metals purchase agreement.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing, failure to obtain necessary permits to continue mining operations Technology risks Mining partners are responsible for decision-making and costs related to technology and the deployment of low carbon technologies and mines. Risks of failure by mining partners to implement low carbon technologies. Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services, risk of restricted access to capital markets in the event of failure to comply with growing ESG reporting requirements Reputation risks Stakeholders perceive mining partners as contributing to chronic physical impacts through their use of resources in resource-stressed regions (e.g. water-stressed regions) GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2020 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2025 | 4,252,000.00 | 4,440,000.00 | 2,976,400.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA SDS; IEA STEPS; IEA NZE2050 | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | The potential failure of a tailings storage facility or dam may be impacted by increased rainfall or variability in chronic rain and temperature. Changes in the intensity or frequency of extreme weather events can impact the operation of the facilities, requiring additional planning and infrastructure to manage the impacts. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | There is a risk that investment in a technology solution that is currently available results in reduced efficiency and increased costs compared with alternatives that could be developed. | In the future, commodity market pricing mechanisms could assign a premium to products with lower embedded GHG emissions. Second order impacts from changes in the energy mix, for example the reduction in petroleum production may affect prices for key inputs to the business such as fuel, sulphur, ammonium nitrate. | The continued use of coal for the power provided in Panama could hinder the ability of the company to take advantage of strategic opportunities or limit access to capital markets, as stakeholder expectations for decarbonisation increase. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | Yes | Yes (unknown) | |
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 17.301 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2025 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 4,252,000.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 4,440,000.00 1st Interim Target Goal 2,976,400.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA SDS; IEA STEPS; IEA NZE2050 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks The potential failure of a tailings storage facility or dam may be impacted by increased rainfall or variability in chronic rain and temperature. Changes in the intensity or frequency of extreme weather events can impact the operation of the facilities, requiring additional planning and infrastructure to manage the impacts.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks There is a risk that investment in a technology solution that is currently available results in reduced efficiency and increased costs compared with alternatives that could be developed. Market risks In the future, commodity market pricing mechanisms could assign a premium to products with lower embedded GHG emissions. Second order impacts from changes in the energy mix, for example the reduction in petroleum production may affect prices for key inputs to the business such as fuel, sulphur, ammonium nitrate. Reputation risks The continued use of coal for the power provided in Panama could hinder the ability of the company to take advantage of strategic opportunities or limit access to capital markets, as stakeholder expectations for decarbonisation increase. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Yes (unknown) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2020 | First Interim: 37.5% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories 4, 5 by 2035; Second Interim: 37.5% Reduction of Emissions intensity kgCO2eq/sq.ft by 2035 | Not disclosed | Not disclosed | Not disclosed | 22.36 | 13.98 | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions | We are a big consumer of utilities, electricity, natural gas, and fuel. Increases in the price of these items may affect us. | Failure to act with integrity or to maintain ethical and socially responsible activities could damage our reputation and have a material impact on our financial position. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | No | |||||
Industry Retail trade Market cap 16.942 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 37.5% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 categories 4, 5 by 2035; Second Interim: 37.5% Reduction of Emissions intensity kgCO2eq/sq.ft by 2035 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data Not disclosed 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data Not disclosed 1st Interim Target Goal Not disclosed 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 22.36 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2nd Interim Target Goal 13.98 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Market risks We are a big consumer of utilities, electricity, natural gas, and fuel. Increases in the price of these items may affect us. Reputation risks Failure to act with integrity or to maintain ethical and socially responsible activities could damage our reputation and have a material impact on our financial position. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Increased temperatures could impact our networks, IT systems, equipment and other infrastructure which could require the installation of additional cooling devices; climate change related impacts to our key suppliers could adversely affect their ability to supply us with required products and services. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Failure to recognize and adequately respond to changing environmental matters and expectations, or to comply with environmental laws and regulations, could result in fines, new regulatory obligations and associated costs, or damage to our reputation or brand, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and/or financial results. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | Yes | No | |||
Industry Information and cultural industries Market cap 16.709 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? N/A Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Increased temperatures could impact our networks, IT systems, equipment and other infrastructure which could require the installation of additional cooling devices; climate change related impacts to our key suppliers could adversely affect their ability to supply us with required products and services.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks Failure to recognize and adequately respond to changing environmental matters and expectations, or to comply with environmental laws and regulations, could result in fines, new regulatory obligations and associated costs, or damage to our reputation or brand, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and/or financial results. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 | 2005 | First Interim: 55.% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2025 | 26,902,000.00 | 24,611,000.00 | 12,105,900.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Hydrogen, small modular reactors, CCUS | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Precipitation changes potentially impact hydro generation availability, increased capital to harden infrastructure against rising seas and storm surge and increased precipitation events. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing, risk of early retirement of assets Increased costs due to climate-related litigation, and fines from regulators | Replacement of existing energy supply sources with renewable/lower carbon sources; early retirement of existing assets prior to the end of their useful life. | Customer desire for lower emitting energy sources; changes in supply chain as a result of regulation and/or market demand; uncertainty in asset insurance options | Increased stakeholder concern associated with carbon intensive business | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | No | |
Industry Utilities Market cap 16.182 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2050 Reference Year 2005 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 55.% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2025 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 26,902,000.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 24,611,000.00 1st Interim Target Goal 12,105,900.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Hydrogen, small modular reactors, CCUS Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Precipitation changes potentially impact hydro generation availability, increased capital to harden infrastructure against rising seas and storm surge and increased precipitation events.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing, risk of early retirement of assets Technology risks Replacement of existing energy supply sources with renewable/lower carbon sources; early retirement of existing assets prior to the end of their useful life. Market risks Customer desire for lower emitting energy sources; changes in supply chain as a result of regulation and/or market demand; uncertainty in asset insurance options Reputation risks Increased stakeholder concern associated with carbon intensive business GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2020 | First Interim: 20% Reduction of CO2 intensity tCO2e/tonne of product by 2025; Second Interim: 20% Reduction of Energy intensity (GJ/tonne of product) by 2025 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 3.00 | 2.95 | 2.40 | N/A | Yes | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions | Changes in weather patterns could impact the price and the availability of the raw material and influence our results upwards or downwards. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | A growing group of consumers are turning away from animal-related products in favour of plant-based alternatives to reduce their carbon footprint. This could lead to reduced demand for dairy products. Some of our customers are addressing this trend by asking for a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions throughout the supply chain. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | Yes (unknown) | |||
Industry Wholesale trade Market cap 13.924 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 20% Reduction of CO2 intensity tCO2e/tonne of product by 2025; Second Interim: 20% Reduction of Energy intensity (GJ/tonne of product) by 2025 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 0.22 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 0.20 1st Interim Target Goal 0.18 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 3.00 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2.95 2nd Interim Target Goal 2.40 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions Chronic risks Changes in weather patterns could impact the price and the availability of the raw material and influence our results upwards or downwards.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market risks A growing group of consumers are turning away from animal-related products in favour of plant-based alternatives to reduce their carbon footprint. This could lead to reduced demand for dairy products. Some of our customers are addressing this trend by asking for a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions throughout the supply chain. Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Yes (unknown) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2040 | 2022 | First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 category 6 by 2030 | 48,968.00 | 48,968.00 | 24,484.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Increased attention from shareholders, customers and other key relationships regarding our environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) practices could impact our business activities, financial performance and reputation. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | No | |||||
Industry Professional, scientific, and technical services Market cap 13.751 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2040 Reference Year 2022 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 50% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 category 6 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 48,968.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 48,968.00 1st Interim Target Goal 24,484.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? N/A Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks Increased attention from shareholders, customers and other key relationships regarding our environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) practices could impact our business activities, financial performance and reputation. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA STEPS; IPCC RCP4.5; IPCC RCP8.5 | No | Nuclear | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Changes in precipitation that result in droughts could increase the risk of wildfire caused by the corporation's electricity assets or may cause water shortages that could adversely affect operations. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing; exclusion of nuclear power from green taxonomies may decrease competitiveness | Risks related to disruptive lower emissions technologies that cause earlier-than-planned replacement of capital assets. | Lack of sufficient transparency and action on climate issues could result in reputational damage with local stakeholders and the investment community. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | Yes | PWL LLP Limited Assurance | ||
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 12.951 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA STEPS; IPCC RCP4.5; IPCC RCP8.5 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Nuclear Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Changes in precipitation that result in droughts could increase the risk of wildfire caused by the corporation's electricity assets or may cause water shortages that could adversely affect operations.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing; exclusion of nuclear power from green taxonomies may decrease competitiveness Technology risks Risks related to disruptive lower emissions technologies that cause earlier-than-planned replacement of capital assets. Market risks Reputation risks Lack of sufficient transparency and action on climate issues could result in reputational damage with local stakeholders and the investment community. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? PWL LLP Limited Assurance |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2017 | First Interim: 1Mt Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 emissions by 2023 | 3,220,317.00 | 2,183,775.00 | 2,220,317.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA SDS; IEA ETP 2C scenario; IEA WEO STEPS; IPCC RCP 6 | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | New and emerging technologies can impact grid efficiency, energy prices, and investment economics, and reduce customer consumption, and provide customers with alternatives for meeting their energy and water needs through new sources rather than traditional regulated utility providers. | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | Lack of sufficient transparency and action on climate issues could result in reputational damage with local stakeholders and the investment community. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | Yes | KPMG LLP | ||
Industry Utilities Market cap 12.477 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2017 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 1Mt Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2 emissions by 2023 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 3,220,317.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 2,183,775.00 1st Interim Target Goal 2,220,317.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA SDS; IEA ETP 2C scenario; IEA WEO STEPS; IPCC RCP 6 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks New and emerging technologies can impact grid efficiency, energy prices, and investment economics, and reduce customer consumption, and provide customers with alternatives for meeting their energy and water needs through new sources rather than traditional regulated utility providers. Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks Lack of sufficient transparency and action on climate issues could result in reputational damage with local stakeholders and the investment community. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? Yes Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? KPMG LLP |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | Apex Companies LLC | ||||||
Industry Manufacturing Market cap 10.604 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Apex Companies LLC |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2020 | First Interim: 40% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 category 14 by 2030 | 87,146.00 | 82,807.00 | 52,287.60 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions | Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services | The company recognizes that proper stewardship of environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) matters that are relevant to its business contributes positively to the company’s reputation. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | DNV Business Assurance USA | ||||
Industry Retail trade Market cap 9.139 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2020 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 40% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 category 14 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 87,146.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 82,807.00 1st Interim Target Goal 52,287.60 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Market risks Level of competition, decrease/shifts in consumer attitudes/demand for lower-carbon products/services Reputation risks The company recognizes that proper stewardship of environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) matters that are relevant to its business contributes positively to the company’s reputation. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? DNV Business Assurance USA |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | IPCC RCP 8.5; 2C scenario | Yes | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions | Reduced IT access, temporary lack of HR, flight safety | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Increased costs due to climate-related litigation | Costs associated with the replacement of CAE's assets for more efficient technologies | Rising insurance premiumns, Insufficient energy and raw resources, more expensive resources | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | No | ||
Industry Manufacturing Market cap 8.736 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IPCC RCP 8.5; 2C scenario Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions Chronic risks Reduced IT access, temporary lack of HR, flight safety
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Costs associated with the replacement of CAE's assets for more efficient technologies Market risks Rising insurance premiumns, Insufficient energy and raw resources, more expensive resources Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? No |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; increase in insurance premiums | Increases in the duration and magnitude of chronic climate-related risks such as heat stress, winter weather, water stress, freeze-thaw cycles, and disease | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Shift to renewable energy, battery storage, and energy efficiency equipment | Adjustments in goods and services purchased by CAPREIT, shifts in the preferences of occupants | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | ESG Global Advisors | ||
Industry Real estate, and rental and leasing Market cap 8.265 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? N/A Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; increase in insurance premiums Chronic risks Increases in the duration and magnitude of chronic climate-related risks such as heat stress, winter weather, water stress, freeze-thaw cycles, and disease
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Shift to renewable energy, battery storage, and energy efficiency equipment Market risks Adjustments in goods and services purchased by CAPREIT, shifts in the preferences of occupants Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? ESG Global Advisors |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | N/A | N/A | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Not disclosed | None found | No | N/A | |||||||
Industry Professional, scientific, and technical services Market cap 7.861 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year N/A Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? N/A Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Chronic risks
Policy & legal risks
Technology risks Market risks Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? None found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? N/A |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | N/A | 2018 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1. 2 by 2030 | 442,420.00 | 372,640.00 | 309,694.00 | N/A | N/A | N/A | IEA NZE2050; IEA SDS; IEA STEPS; IEA failed Transition scenario; IPCC RCP 2.6; IPCC RCP 4.5; IPCC RCP 6.0 | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions | Future events could slow and/or halt production due to physical damage to our assets, resulting in increased employee absenteeism and reduced worker productivity in order to address incremental safety measures during extreme weather conditions, and/or resulting in supply chain disruptions limiting transportation of supplies or delivery of goods. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Energy consumption costs and transportation costs. These could have relevant financial implications, considering that low-cost and efficiency are core strengths of our successful integrated business mode; consumer preferences and attitudes affecting their spending behaviour. | Failure to achieve our greenhouse gas targets, or a perception among investors that our targets lack ambition and/or are deemed to be insufficient, could adversely affect the company’s reputation and ability to attract capital. | Yes board oversight Management Responsibilities not found | No | Corporate Citizenship Limited | ||
Industry Retail trade Market cap 7.648 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target N/A Reference Year 2018 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Absolute Scope 1. 2 by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 442,420.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 372,640.00 1st Interim Target Goal 309,694.00 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? IEA NZE2050; IEA SDS; IEA STEPS; IEA failed Transition scenario; IPCC RCP 2.6; IPCC RCP 4.5; IPCC RCP 6.0 Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations; supply chain disruptions Chronic risks Future events could slow and/or halt production due to physical damage to our assets, resulting in increased employee absenteeism and reduced worker productivity in order to address incremental safety measures during extreme weather conditions, and/or resulting in supply chain disruptions limiting transportation of supplies or delivery of goods.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Market risks Energy consumption costs and transportation costs. These could have relevant financial implications, considering that low-cost and efficiency are core strengths of our successful integrated business mode; consumer preferences and attitudes affecting their spending behaviour. Reputation risks Failure to achieve our greenhouse gas targets, or a perception among investors that our targets lack ambition and/or are deemed to be insufficient, could adversely affect the company’s reputation and ability to attract capital. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management Responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? Corporate Citizenship Limited |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes | Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 | 2021 | First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1 kgCO2e/Au eq oz. by 2030; Second Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 2 kgCO2e/Au eq oz. by 2030 | 542.00 | 542.00 | 379.40 | 266.00 | 266.00 | 186.20 | N/A | No | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Changes in the climatic parameters, water deficits have caused impacts, even at sites where intense rainfall is common. Precipitation projections vary across sites, with a tendency for relatively wet regions and wet times of the year to become wetter and dry regions and dry times of the year to become drier. | Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing | Risk posed by older, higher-emission technologies versus the opportunities presented by new and future technologies. These are considered within the context of financial, operational, and strategic impacts. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | PWC LLP | |||
Industry Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction Market cap 5.963 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment Yes Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2 by 2050 Reference Year 2021 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target First Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 1 kgCO2e/Au eq oz. by 2030; Second Interim: 30% Reduction of Emissions intensity Scope 2 kgCO2e/Au eq oz. by 2030 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data 542.00 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data 542.00 1st Interim Target Goal 379.40 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data 266.00 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data 266.00 2nd Interim Target Goal 186.20 Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? No Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Changes in the climatic parameters, water deficits have caused impacts, even at sites where intense rainfall is common. Precipitation projections vary across sites, with a tendency for relatively wet regions and wet times of the year to become wetter and dry regions and dry times of the year to become drier.
Policy & legal risks
Regulation imposing additional costs on environmental compliance and increase cost of production through carbon pricing Technology risks Risk posed by older, higher-emission technologies versus the opportunities presented by new and future technologies. These are considered within the context of financial, operational, and strategic impacts. Market risks Reputation risks GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? PWC LLP |
||||||||||||||||||||||
No | Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2030 | 2019 | No Target | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes | Not disclosed | Extreme weather can negatively impact operations | Severe shifts in climate patterns could impact the costs and availability of potable water in those locations, but also result in higher workforce-related costs as sites are expected to provide conditions allowing for scheduled regular breaks when temperatures rise above (or drop under) certain thresholds along with other increased weather-related health and safety provisions. | Changing regulation require employees to be up-to-speed on current and emerging regulations Potential for professional liability exposure in the event faulty climate-related professional services were to be provided to such a “large final emitter” client | SNC-Lavalin is a service provider to traditionally high-emission industries such as mining and metallurgy and power utilities. As such, it is expected to be informed about technology innovations in order to provide clients with best in class and most up to date technology options. | Past involvement in many projects for clients in the oil and gas sector, some of whom have suffered reputational damage and risks to their business model as a result of their contribution to climate change. | Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found | No | EY LLP | ||
Industry Professional, scientific, and technical services Market cap 4.793 Emissions Reduction CommitmentsNet Zero Commitment No Net Zero Target Absolute Scope 1, 2, 3 by 2030 Reference Year 2019 Interim Target ProgressInterim Target No Target 1st Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 1st Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 1st Interim Target Goal N/A 2nd Interim Target Ref. Year Data N/A 2nd Interim Most Recently Reported Data N/A 2nd Interim Target Goal N/A Credibility & Scenario AnalysisDoes the company use multiple scenarios for scenario analysis planning? N/A Does the company rely on the use of offsets to meet climate target? Yes Is there a heavy reliance on wild card technologies? Not disclosed Climate Risks & TransitionAcute risks Extreme weather can negatively impact operations Chronic risks Severe shifts in climate patterns could impact the costs and availability of potable water in those locations, but also result in higher workforce-related costs as sites are expected to provide conditions allowing for scheduled regular breaks when temperatures rise above (or drop under) certain thresholds along with other increased weather-related health and safety provisions.
Policy & legal risks
Changing regulation require employees to be up-to-speed on current and emerging regulations Technology risks SNC-Lavalin is a service provider to traditionally high-emission industries such as mining and metallurgy and power utilities. As such, it is expected to be informed about technology innovations in order to provide clients with best in class and most up to date technology options. Market risks Reputation risks Past involvement in many projects for clients in the oil and gas sector, some of whom have suffered reputational damage and risks to their business model as a result of their contribution to climate change. GovernanceHas the organization assigned net zero commitment responsibilities to management/exective/board-level positions? Yes board oversight Management responsibilities not found Is compensation linked to performance on climate-related metrics? No Are there any third-party auditing mechanisms in place to review climate targets and disclosure data? EY LLP |
The Corporate Climate Commitment Tracker was last updated on October 31, 2022. We welcome any comments or suggestions at 440megatonnes@climateinstitute.ca.